I will pay for the following essay Technical description of a Swingline Deluxe Staple Remover*. The essay is to be 2 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

This causes the folded edges on the reverse side to open up pulling through the entry holes. The method requires less time as compared to the fast method. However, it may have the undesirable effect of tearing the paper as the edges pull through. Usually, Tearing occurs when low-quality paper is used (Ness, 2013). Another simple method of using the staple remover is the “safe” method. The technique is most preferred because it reduces the risk of damage to the paper. The user is required to turn the paper to the side in which the prongs of the staple have been folded. The opposite pair of tines is then used to clip the prongs. The prongs are straightened and raised from the paper. The paper is the turned over to the front side against the side pressed by the main body of the staple. The tines are turned gently on each side of the remover. The remover’s halves are pressed together until they hold firmly on the staple. A firm hold on the staple is maintained until the entire staple is pulled out of the paper (Ness, 2013).

The staple remover has been assembled using blades, torsion springs, plastic grips, and pin axle. The pivoting blades are made of steel and interlock each other. Steel is harder than the ductile staple wire and is strong enough to withstand the force to remove it (Roberts, 2012). The plating of the chrome is rust resistant and is, therefore, suitable for use in the office environment.

The torsion spring is standardized and similar to the one found on other simple tools such as clothes pegs. It is made of steel that is chrome-plated and has two hooks. The material is used to ensure that the spring does not fail through fatigue because it has a point of minimum stress (Roberts, 2012).

The other part is the plastic grip. The part is not very necessary because the tool can be operating without it. It provides holding comfort to the user because they do not have to press their hands on a piece of metal. The

Hi, I need help with essay on INTERNATIONAL POLITICS. Paper must be at least 3000 words. Please, no plagiarized work!

Politics on this earth progressively became conquered by one type of division: the sovereign national state (SNS)ii. This study will focus on the questions-What is the Westphalian system and to what extent has it been undermined by globalization?

The Westphalian system is the worldwide system emblematically instated at the Peace of Westphalia, 1648, which completed the Thirty Years War. At Westphalia the state was set up as an independent political division, meaning that it accredited no rival authorities. Popes and monarchs could no longer interfere straightforwardly in the relationships of the state, but neither could it include sovereign feudal jurisdictions or self-governing peasant societies. The plan of a universal society was devastated. or rather it was re-explained as a worldwide system. Several states were autonomous, but they co-existed in a surrounded space where they continued regular communications with each other. De jure, all states were identical, and although de facto a number of states visibly were more influential than others, the dissimilarities between them were not adequately large for a clear-cut structure to appear. Allegorically speaking, the Westphalian system was a game of billiards with states crashing and jumping into, and off, each other. Autonomy awarded each state the right to take care of its personal affairs: an opportunity first enjoyed by emperors and later, after the national revolts which was pursued by the French Revolution, by individuals. The Westphalian system produces guaranteed “national self-determination” and “non-interference” in the matters of other territories. To the states supporters this was a great move forward. Kingdoms, indeed any highly planned communication with other territories, associated with the past: to a Roman period, kept in mind for its “despotism” instead of for its centuries-long harmony, to the gloomy Middle Ages, or probably to a