Write 10 page essay on the topic Paper for the legal environment of business and online commerce.

Legal and illegal migrants are around 2.2 million people. It attracts a small percentage of expatriates or emigrants from Western developed countries.

Thailand is a devout, Buddhist country. The national religion is Theravada Buddhism, practiced by over 94.7% of the people in Thai. Muslims consist of 4.6% of the population. The final 0.7% of religious practices belongs to other religions. India influences the culture and traditions in Thailand, Burma, Laos, and Cambodia. Thailand’s international disputes have forced border closures because of the separatist violence in predominately Muslim, southern provinces. The disputes are strengthened with control over Malaysia to stem terrorist activities.

Thailand is a Constitutional Monarchy with a Monarch acting as the head of state. The government style is written or codified, unwritten or un-codified, and a blended constitution. Thailand’s Constitutional Monarchy Government is dissimilar from an Absolute Monarchy, the sole source of political power in the state. It is not legally bound by another constitution.

The Chief of State is King Phumiphon Adunyadet, reigning since June 9, 1946. His advisor is the Privy Council. The Prime Minister is Abhisit Wetchachiwa, reigning since December 17, 2008. The Deputy Prime Ministers are Korbsak Saphawasu, Sanan Kachornprasat, and Suthep Thueaksuban. They have been the deputy prime ministers since December 22, 2008 (Saphawasu), February 7, 2008 (Kachornparsart), and December 22, 2008 (Thueaksuban). The elections of the monarch are hereditary. The selection of the prime minister is from the members of the House of Representatives. The king appoints the prime minister based on the leader of the party who organized the majority coalition. The term limit is for two four-year terms.

The Bi-Cameral National Assembly, known as Rathasapha, consists of the Senate or Wuthisapha with 150 seats.

Compose a 500 words essay on The American Civil War: A Bloody Battle. Needs to be plagiarism free!

The Industrial Age and Revolution of the 1900’s developed better methods in producing equipment with efficiency and effectiveness. This led to the beginning of factory centers that massively produced the finished material needed for various activities. In the case of warfare, the advent of mass production enabled weapons to be manufactured at such a quickened pace without suffering the decrease in quality. Huge stockpiles of infantry weapons and artillery could be made quickly to hastily equip armies for war mobilization. In this sense, this decreases the problem and increases the advantages of military logistics in keeping armies supplied and equipped. The Industrial Age also introduced the heavy use of the rail system as vital for military logistics and deployment. The use of trains also quickened the movement and deployment of a large contingent of armies and supplies to different battlefronts. A massive number of troops could be deployed from opposite battlefronts to engage in an all-out war on a large-scale basis compared to 17th to 19th-century warfare.

In the matter of military technology, new weapons were developed. These new artilleries could kill more effectively and efficiently. A research made by Engelking (2009) noted the impact of the rifle on Civil War wherein the rifling in the barrel meant that the projectile was much more accurate at a farther range. The rifle replaced the highly inaccurate smoothbore musket as the primary weapon of the line infantry of both Union and Confederate armies. It was not only more accurate, but it was also very lethal and could inflict mortal wounds. The introduction and production of breech-loaded weapons also increased the rate of fire of different weapons, such as the cannons and howitzers. Repeating rifles and pistols were also introduced, and the use of the Gatling gun would decimate the tight mass assault formations of opposing armies on the offensive. The doctrine of total war had one of its objectives set on destroying enemy armies totally so that such forces would not regroup to fight again or commit guerilla operations. This meant that armies would fight to ensure that one force is either completely annihilated or wiped out. Since most of the commanders from both the Union and Confederacy were more acquainted with 18th-century military doctrine, their armies would take horrific casualties as the new weapons and new military tactics cut down mass assaults by the infantries. This contributed to the ghastly number of casualties that both sides endured during the American Civil War.