Create a 6 page essay paper that discusses A comparitive Study of Clinton’s and George Bush’s Economic Policies.

Bush supporters argue that Clinton inherited a booming economy on the upswing from the previous Reagan/Bush presidencies then ran it into the ground for which George W. now takes the blame. Many Clinton backers disagree taking the position that the current Bush administration has instituted a faith-based economic policy. that Armageddon will happen soon so it doesn’t matter how the country’s economy is managed. To give total credit or blame to one person for every aspect of the nation’s economic condition is hardly a credible stance. However, this paper will compare the two presidents’ economic policies as they relate directly to the end result in similar categories as a means to compare their successes and failures on an even playing field. To that end, this discussion provides an extensive view of the economy over the previous 12 years spotlighting on percentage changes of several economic indicators rather than total number.

The steady creation of employment opportunities is one of the most telling signs of a country’s economic condition. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of jobs increased 2.38 percent per year under Clinton, but it has decreased 0.17 percent per year in the years Bush has held office (Atkinson & Hutto, 2004). The Bush administration claimed that the economy was on a downturn following the Clinton presidency then was further hindered by the attacks on the World Trade Center in 2001. Bush sold the idea of tax cuts to the public predicting that this step would help to stimulate the economy by creating 3.7 million jobs in 2003, but produced only 1.7 million, fewer than the number of births in the country that year (Council of Economic Advisors, 2003). By contrast, 22 million jobs were created during the eight years Clinton was in office. The tax cut concept was not based on sound, objective economic analysis, rather it was an ideology borrowed from the equally failed

Need an research paper on inequality for all. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism. Sociology: Inequality for All Introduction Since the 1970s the United s of America has been noticing a rapid increase in economic inequality. The rich people are always getting richer while the poor of middle class are continuing to drown in dept and live a life that is not desirable. Robert Reich shows this factor clearly in the documentary directed by Jacob Kornbluth. One of the reasons as to why the economic inequality is widening as from the documentary is the fact that the government of the United States of America is focusing on making the economy grow instead of distributing it. Robert Reich at a point states that the economy of the United States doubled and yet people in the middle class did not see any changes in their income yet the one percent god a rapid increase in their income (Kornbluth, et al.,2014). The other cause to this inequality as cited by Robert is the fact that the government focuses more on deducting the taxes for people who are earning a lot of money yet they increase the taxation for individuals with low income.

Economic inequality in the United States affects the middle class and the general economy of the state. Before economic inequality is said to have affected the whole economy then the results of its presence can be noted by its impact on the middle class citizens. Crime and early pregnancies are normally as a result of the inequalities in the society. For example, once an individual lives in a family that is unable to sustain themselves then they are forced to look for other means of survival such as resulting into crime or prostitution. Such cases are normally witnessed in the lives of people who are in the middle and low class (Kornbluth, et al., 2014).

Economic inequality also hurts the economy of a whole country. The distribution of income is very vital while discussing this point. For example, if all the income the U.S generates is distributed to the rich people then people in the middle class will be demoralized. It is keen to note that most of the income depends on the work being done by people in the middle class and once their demands are not met well they resign to look for better jobs or become demotivated hence the economy of the whole country is jeopardized (Kornbluth, et al., 2014).

Robert while stating that the widening social inequality would affect democracy means that, once income flows to the rich and also people majorly in power then the laws can be manipulated to favor them. For example, if a person files a case over another person who is much wealthier than them then there is a possibility of losing their case not because they were filling something falls but because they lack the resources that would help them give accurate information like for instance a good lawyer.

Conclusion

It is unnecessary for the United States to struggle to achieve equality in the economy. First and foremost it is a very big task to have this accomplished as most of the people who would help stabilizing the economy are the rich who are just getting themselves richer. The biggest disadvantage in getting the economy equalized is that then people will tend to be lazy and less innovative which in turn affects the whole country in general.

Reference:

Kornbluth, J., et al., (2014).&nbsp.Inequality for all.