Entries by Student

write my assignment 19749

Chapter 2: Business and Staffing Strategies1. What are the three most important ethical principles that you feel organizations should adhere to in terms of their staffing philosophies? Why?3. Suppose you were in charge of recruiting and staffing the software engineers who would work for Google. Do you think that a company like Google should hire software engineers with the skills it needs or train them to develop those skills? Why?5. List the costs and benefits of having an internal staffing focus. Then list the cost and benefits of having an external staffing focus. What are the trade-offs between the two approaches?Chapter 3: The Legal Context3. What is the difference between flow, stock, and concentration statistics? How is each type of statistic used?4. What is affirmative action? What is an affirmative action plan? Do you feel that affirmative action is a good way to remedy past discrimination? Why or why not?5. Which three general barriers to legally defensible staffing do you feel are most common? What can companies do to remove these barriers?Exercise. Go to http:// and select a recent EEO litigation settlement. Summarize the issue(s) presented in the case, identify the relevant EEO laws, and explain why the court ruled as it did. How could the company have prevented this lawsuit in the first place?Chapter 4: Strategic Job Analysis and Competency Modeling1. Why do you think some organizations choose to not perform job analyses given their benefits? What could be done to increase their willingness to analyze jobs?2. How can job analysis make staffing more strategic?5. Some jobs change so rapidly that companies do not feel doing a job analysis is worthwhile because by the time one is done, it’s already outdated. What advice would you give such a company to help them take advantage of the benefits a job analysis has to offer without wasting unnecessary time and resources doing a traditional job analysis?

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

November 21, 2021by

write my assignment 27674

Literature review must meet the following criteria:

  • Minimum 2,000 words
  • Minimum 10 citations
  • Minimum 3 major sub-sections
  • Must explicitly inform your research design in some way (RQs, Methods, etc)
  • Abstract details
  • Contains an abstract between 150-300 words that passes muster.For tips on writing an abstract, I highly recommend this resource: https://theprofessorisin.com/2011/07/12/how-tosday-how-to-write-a-paper-abstract/

Methods Presentation Analysis

  • When presenting professional research, it is important to understand the conventions used in your field to convey information. For this assignment, you will be reading articles on your topic to try and understand different approaches and conventions that other authors use.
  • The purpose of this assignment is to get you to think about and analyze how others have measured and researched their research topic in the past. Find three articles about your research topic that you found interesting. After re-reading them, analyze how they approached their research design and how they chose to present their results. Was their approach effective? What can you learn from their presentations about how you might present your own work?
  • Requirements: 
  • Minimum 1500 words
  • Analyze three articles on your research topic, explaining for each article:What type of research design they used (quantitative, qualitative, etc)
  1. How this design was set up
  2. What the author’s results were
  3. How the author presented the results
  4. Whether you think their presentation was effective and convincing
  5.  Conclude by explaining what about these articles’ presentations of their methodology you plan to incorporate into your methods chapter of the proposal.

Methods

  • Document criteria:
  • Minimum 1500 words
  • Must contain explicit subsections appropriate to paradigm
  • Stating your method is not enough. You must go further.
  • If you’re doing interviews, we need to see a guide with citations and critical analysis
  • If you’re analyzing a tool, we need significant details and visualization
  • Must say WHY you’re choosing your method, CITE it, DEFEND it
  • Must contain explicit data analysis plan
  • “I’m going to read” is not an analysis plan
  • If you’re doing qualitative analysis, you must lay out your theoretical framework and explain how you will interpret and arrive at your answers
  • If you are doing quantitative research, we need an explicit discussion of how you assembled your study. Questionnaire? Where did you get the questions/scales from and what are they assessing? How are they evaluated (likert scale? semantic differential?)?
  • Minimum 5 citations

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

November 21, 2021by

write my assignment 2342

The CIO is now completely sold on the idea of DOD certification and want you to investigate the DIACAP. Explain to the CIO the history of accreditation/authorization briefly.Answers the following ques

The CIO is now completely sold on the idea of DOD certification and want you to investigate the DIACAP. Explain to the CIO the history of accreditation/authorization briefly.

Answers the following questions to the CIO. (500-700words)

1.       What is the difference between the Orange Book and the DITSCAP?

2. When was DITSCAP superceded by DIACAP and why?

3. What is NIACAP?

4. What is the current process used for accrediting/authorizing DoD systems?

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

November 21, 2021by

write my assignment 11058

OL 633 2-1 Journal: Kotter’s Steps 5 Through 8

In our text Our Iceberg Is Melting, Kotter provides a story-based scenario of a situation needing a change intervention.

Review the reading from our text and state how Kotter’s last four steps (5 through 8) were applied in the story (two paragraphs), and then reflect on an organizational change effort that you are familiar with from the past (you can use the same organizational change effort you used for Module One) using Kotter’s last four steps (5 through 8) to diagnose the strengths and weaknesses of the change effort.

Make sure to include what was done well, what was done poorly, and what was lacking in the change effort (two paragraphs, for a total of four paragraphs).For additional details, please refer to the Module Two Journal Guidelines and Rubric document.

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

November 21, 2021by