Entries by Student

write my assignment 29827

Before responding to this discussion, read both Requirements and Developing Requirements for an IT System assigned for Week 5.

For your Stage 3 assignment, you will analyze the hiring process at Maryland Technology Consultants (MTC) to identify the essential requirements for the hiring system.  For this discussion, you will practice analyzing processes to identify user requirements for a system to improve a process.

Some students may still have difficulty identifying processes; be sure to refer to the Week 3 readings that describe various processes and review the Week 3 discussion.  Keep in mind that a process is a set of specified steps to accomplish a task.

This week’s discussion topic focuses on system requirements that need to be clearly written so that the people who are developing the system or evaluating a system for use can discern whether the requirements are met or not. 

The requirement statement:

  • Is a complete sentence, with a subject (system) and predicate (intended result, action or condition)
  • Identifies only one requirement; does not include the words “and,” “also,” “with,” and “or.”
  • For User Requirements, states what tasks the system will support or perform
  • Includes a measure or metric that can be used to determine whether the requirement is met (time or quantity), where appropriate
  • Is stated in positive terms and uses “must” (not “may” or “should”); e.g., “the system must xxxx”not “the system must not xxx”
  • Avoids the use of terms that cannot be defined and measured, such as “approximately,” “robust,” “user friendly,” etc.
  • Must be testable; that is, there must be some way to test the system to determine whether the requirement is met

Group 1:

1.      Drawing from your own experience, select a process used at your place of work or in your interaction with an organization that you would like to see improved.  Explain why you picked that process. 

2.      Imagine that a system is to be implemented (or an existing system improved) to make that process better and write five (5) user requirements that the system would need to satisfy.  Each requirement is one sentence in length and addresses one thing the system must do.  Here we are interested in user requirements – the activities the system must perform to support the identified process.  We are not including system performance, quality or security requirements that express how the system would perform.  Use the information above to create your requirements statements.

Groups 2, 3, and 4:  Reply to three different main postings.  You are to critically evaluate all of the following as you reply:

1.      Should the process identified actually be considered a “process”?  That is, does it meet the definition of “a set of specified steps to accomplish a task”? Why or why not?

2.      Do the requirements listed support the selected process?

3.      Are the requirements clearly stated such that system testers will be able to ascertain whether or not the requirement has been implemented?  

4.     Provide an example of a rewritten requirement that improves one of the user requirements using the information provided above.  

Remember – the Group 1 initial posting is due by Wednesday midnight; it should be about two short paragraphs in length, supported by external research, and it should be posted by clicking on “Start a New Thread”.  These postings need to thoroughly respond to the questions and incorporate relevant research correctly.  Please look at what has been posted by your classmates before choosing your examples, and then select something that has not yet been discussed, if possible. Let’s try to spread the discussion across as many examples as possible. 

Then members of Groups 2, 3, and 4 should reply to at least three different postings by other classmates before Sunday midnight.  Responses to initial postings should be specific and assess whether the posting accurately and sufficiently addresses the questions asked in the discussion topic, and should incorporate relevant research correctly.  Explain your assessment as to why the information is or is not correct and/or complete, providing correct information to enhance the discussion. 

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 3728

70. Randy’s Pizza delivers pizzas to dormitories and apartments near a major state university. The company’s annual fixed costs are $48,000. The sales price averages $9, and it costs the firm $3 to make and deliver each pizza.

Required:

A. How many pizzas must Randy’s sell to break even?

B. How many pizzas must the company sell to earn a target profit of $54,000?

C. If budgeted sales total 9,900 pizzas, how much is the company’s safety margin in dollars?

D. Tony’s assistant manager, an accounting major, has suggested that the firm should try to increase the contribution margin per pizza. Explain the meaning of “contribution margin” in layman’s terms. 

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 5907

We begin by looking at a simple 2*2 factorial with 5 replications in a CRD (completely randomized design). Let the following table denote mean yields, Yij MAIN EFFECT OF P, MAIN EFFECT OF N What we see is that the difference between low P and high P is a difference in mean yield of 40 – 31 = 9 in our sample. Is there a nonzero difference in the population? INTERACTION OF P AND N We see that this difference, 9, is not consistent over the levels of N. When N is low (n” ) a change in P produces an increase 6 in yield. When N is high, the increase in P (from p” to p# ) produces an increase in yield of 12. The effect of P depends on the level of N in our sample. Another way to say this is that N and P interact in the sample. Is this interaction large enough to declare a nonzero interaction in the population?

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 19001

Personal struggles with one’s own tendencies, desires, lusts, and self-interest have placed people in conflict with other people and their own communities farther back than any of us can read. We read about the struggles of others in history — what about ourselves? Yes, us! What about our experiences of being ourselves?

When we look back in history, we find people who are not so different from us — struggling with their human nature — and trying to live ethical lives in whatever way they can do so. They aspire to live ethical lifes and find themselves failing again and again.

St. Augustine in the 5th Century held that although we feel free to make choices in life, our true nature as human beings includes a persistent disregard for what is good. On this view, we are sinners whose only hope for redemption lies in the gracious love of a merciful deity. Whatever I do on my own, Augustine would argue, is bound to be wrong; whatever I do right, must be performed by God through me.

St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13th Century brought Aristotle’s theories back into “vogue,” soon after St. Augustine’s death (if 800 years is soon, that is.) He allowed humanity to have a bit of secularity along with faith, and his ethics allows for a Natural Law which can be found in the heart of man.  Please be sure to listen to our Saints’ Debate in this week’s lesson tab before working in this thread.

So, here we are in the 21st Century with all the sophistication and technology of the age. Does this account of human nature fit well with your own experience of human action? That is, do you observe (in yourself and others) an inclination toward evil instead of toward good?  Bring in examples of scenarios which bolster your view, or which tend to bring your view (or others) into question.

Search entries or author

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer