Entries by Student

write my assignment 30492

Educational Test Still Incentivizes Cheating

Last week out of Texas we have a new version of an old story — a school that found a creative-ish new way to cheat on the Big Standardized Test used to measure each school’s worthiness..

This is a predictable and, at this point, oft-noted phenomenon. If you take a bunch of numbers and tie them to high stakes, people will look for ways to manipulate those numbers. Which is kind of the point of making those numbers high stakes. But some people will manipulate the numbers with legitimate okay-by-the-rules methods, and some people will find other ways to do it. If a plant manager is told that everybody’s bonus depends on low injury-on-the-job numbers, there are many ways to keep those numbers down, and only some of them have anything to do with making the workplace safer. Refusing to let anyone report injuries will work, too. So No Child Left Behind ushered in the era of high stakes testing, and within a few years, the cheating began. With 2014 as the deadline to get 100% students above average, American schools were being steadily divided into two groups — schools that were failing and schools that were cheating. It is of course particularly tempting to cheat when it’s impossible to win by legitimate means.

Some cheaters were caught and suffered huge consequences, like the Atlanta teachers who had their lives and careers trashed. Some large cheating scandals, like the one in DC under former honcho She Who Will Not Be Named, don’t seem to affect anyone’s reputation in the slightest. And those are just the obvious examples. Other schools find less obviously-naughty ways to game the numbers, from the widespread charter practice of pushing out low scoring students (Success Academy got-to-go list, anyone?) to the many public schools that decided to spend less time on education and more time on test prep. Heck, we can go all the way back to the Texas Miracle under future Bush Secretary of Ed Rod Paige was actually a fraud (my personal favorite technique — holding a potentially low-scoring student back for one year, then leapfrogging two year ahead so that they skipped the testing year entirely).

This story out of Texas is a new variation — cheating with a side of privacy violation and abuse of data. The plan was actually pretty simple. In fact, I’ll guarantee you that the Cora Kelly School for Math, Science and Technology is certainly not the only school to think of it, and probably not the only school to do it.

They just used the data to identify students whose numbers were probably going to be bad on the BS Test. Then they called those families and reminded them that they have the right to opt out of testing. Three dozen parents did so, helping the school skew its numbers a little higher.

The only nice thing you can say on the school’s behalf is that nobody has popped up to try to justify this, which is appropriate because not only is straight-up cheating, but it’s also using testing data to single students and their families out for not-so-nice special treatment. I have no quarrel with opting out, which is every parent’s right and just generally a good idea because there are no useful benefits in the BS Tests. But to target some families like this is very Not Cool.

You will never hear me speak in support of cheating. You will never hear me say that the odious and indefensible BS Tests justify cheating. But while high stakes testing does not justify cheating, it certainly incentivizes it. If you tell your child that you’ll give them fifty dollars for a rose, thinking that will encourage said child to start a garden and plant a rose bush and learn how to care for and water it, even though you live in a land frozen tundra — well, you can’t be surprised when your child goes and snags a rose from a greenhouse instead of teaching themselves horticulture.

One of the foundational theories of reformsterism is that rewards and punishment will incentivize the desired behavior in schools. By choosing a bad proxy (BS Test scores standing in for actual student achievement) they’ve created a system of perverse incentives. This doesn’t make cheating okay, but you would have to be an idiot to be surprised that the system spawns cheaters.

After reading the above blog , use the Critical Thinking skills that you have learned in this course to analyze in detail the argument presented, making sure that you clearly state the argument’s conclusion, plus the main implicit and explicit premises. Be sure to note and clearly explain any textbook Rules of Argument that are either applied correctly or incorrectly. Also, identify and explain any fallacies and questionable “facts” that you find in this blog. Recall the Argument Rule- start with reliable premises.

Conduct your own independent research and provide your own well-supported arguments to support or refute the author’s main conclusion. Your answer should clearly state whether or not you agree with the conclusion of the argument presented in the blog, and you should provide concrete evidence from credible sources to support your reasoning.

In order to arrive at a well thought out and well-written answer, you are strongly encouraged to find your own recent credible sources on this topic. Be sure to use proper citations for any references or links that are used in your answer.

Please make sure your answer is no longer than the equivalent of three doublespaced typed pages.

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 19160

While servant leadership is often associated with Christianity and the Bible, one could argue it is compatible with most religions and philosophies and that it transcends cultures. This assignment presents you with an opportunity to explore other cultures, philosophies, and religions and asks you to think critically about how servant leadership practices are apparent in other religious and cultural values.

Select one cultural context and one religious viewpoint (other than Christianity, its denominations, or something already discussed in the textbook) and examine how the principles of servant leadership are evident in that culture and religion. In a 1,250-1,500-word essay, identify similarities and differences between servant leadership’s philosophies and the values evident in the selected cultural context and religious viewpoint. Be sure to provide specific examples of practices and/or values in your discussion.

You are required to locate two articles that examine servant leadership from a different cultural perspective and two articles that examine servant leadership from a different religious perspective. Be sure to select academic articles from reputable sources that are 10-20 pages in length. Include information from the articles in your discussion.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is/is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 17704

Netflix has three different subscription plans for streaming video: watch one screen at a time in Standard Definition for $7.99 per month; watch two screens at a time in High Definition for $10.99 per month; or watch four screens at a time in High and Ultra-High Definition for $13.99 per month. The ongoing difference in cost to Netflix between providing the one-screen plan vs. the four-screen plan is essentially zero. How do you explain the wide variety of prices for virtually the same service, given that the cost to Netflix of providing each plan is basically the same?

Select one:

a. Price discrimination between demanders. High demanders are willing to pay a high price for a plan that includes many channels. Low demanders aren’t, and are only willing to pay a low price for a relatively smaller number of channels.

b. There is less demand for, and more supply of, the one-screen plan so its equilibrium price is low. There is more demand for, and less supply of, the four-screen plan so its equilibrium price is high.

c. Price discrimination between demanders. One-screen plan purchasers are high demanders since they must value the smaller set of channels more than it they had a larger selection of channels they did not want. Four-screen plan purchasers are low demanders since there are many channels in the plan that they likely never watch.

d. Netflix is making the common mistake of trying to gain market share at the expense of maximizing profit. Offering a cheap one-screen plan is meant to entice buyers, but these buyers would usually pay the four-screen price anyway, since Netflix’s streaming video service has no close substitutes.

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 349

Compose a 750 words essay on FINANCIAL DATA ANALYSIS. Needs to be plagiarism free!

Price to Cash flow ratio valuation will estimates value of a firm based on its fundamentals. Thus, the company will pay shareholders based on intrinsic value of the firm. Price to Cash flow ratio valuation captures all key fundamental drivers of economy i.e. price and cash flow. (Warren & Duchac 2012)

Its major drawback is on is the fact that cash flow is very on volatility of cash flaw that constantly changes depending on economic trends. This will result into fluctuation on value of the firm making it risky to potential

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer