write my assignment 31115

THE SOCILA INSTITUTION IS FAMILY

Write a 750-1,000-word analysis on social stratification regarding gender.

 Social institution will be family to describe and analyze the effect that the stratification elements of gender have on the social institution of family. Include the following in your analysis:

1. Explain how gender impacts the social institution.
2. Identify a form of gender inequality associated with the social institution and use theoretical perspectives to explain the social behaviors that perpetuate the inequality.
3. Suggest measures for the social institution to implement to help alleviate the gender inequality you identified.

Provide a minimum of three to five scholarly sources to support your analysis and conclusion. Additionally, you will need to include statistical data of the expression of stratification regarding gender within the social institution.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

Social Stratification Part III: Gender 

1Unsatisfactory0.00%

2Less than Satisfactory65.00%

3Satisfactory75.00%

4Good85.00%

5Excellent100.00%

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Write 750-1,000-word analysis on Social Stratification regarding Gender. Choose a social institution and describe the effect that the stratification elements of Gender have on that social institution. Include the following in your analysis, 1. Explain how Gender impacts the social institution.

Essay does not explain how Gender impacts the social institution.

Essay explains how Gender impacts the social institution; few examples, if any, are provided, and are mostly irrelevant. The approach is not based on sound reasoning or is poorly described. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic.

Essay explains how Gender impacts the social institution with some level of depth; explanation is somewhat limited but approach is based on sound reasoning. Specific examples are provided. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic.

Essay explains how Gender impacts the social institution with accurate details; description shows sound analysis of a clear and valid approach. Examples are relevant and well-delineated.

Essay explains how Gender impacts the social institution with quality details; description is comprehensive and insightful, showing an exceptional approach. Examples are relevant, well-delineated, and promote further reader understanding.

20.0 %2. Identify a form of Gender inequality associated with the social institution and use theoretical perspectives to explain the social behaviors that perpetuate the inequality.

Essay does not discuss Gender inequality associated with the social institution.

Essay identifies a form of Gender inequality associated with the social institution. The theoretical perspectives are used to explain the social behaviors that perpetuate the inequality; few examples, if any, are provided, and are mostly irrelevant. The approach is not based on sound reasoning or is poorly described. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic.

Essay identifies a form of Gender inequality associated with the social institution. The theoretical perspectives are used to explain the social behaviors that perpetuate the inequality with some level of depth; explanation is somewhat limited but approach is based on sound reasoning. Specific examples are provided. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic.

Essay identifies a form of Gender inequality associated with the social institution. The theoretical perspectives are used to explain the social behaviors that perpetuate the inequality with accurate details; description shows sound analysis of a clear and valid approach. Examples are relevant and well-delineated.

Essay identifies a form of Gender inequality associated with the social institution. The theoretical perspectives are used to explain the social behaviors that perpetuate the inequality with quality details; description is comprehensive and insightful, showing an exceptional approach. Examples are relevant, well-delineated, and promote further reader understanding.

20.0 %3. Suggest measures for the social institution to implement to help alleviate the gender inequality you identified.

No measures are suggested to alleviate gender inequality in the institution.

Essay suggests measures to alleviate gender inequality in the institution; few examples, if any, are provided, and are mostly irrelevant. The approach is not based on sound reasoning or is poorly described. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic.

Essay suggests measures to alleviate gender inequality in the institution with some level of depth; explanation is somewhat limited but approach is based on sound reasoning. Specific examples are provided. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic.

Essay suggests measures to alleviate gender inequality in the institution with accurate details; description shows sound analysis of a clear and valid approach. Examples are relevant and well-delineated.

Essay suggests measures to alleviate gender inequality in the institution with quality details; description is comprehensive and insightful, showing an exceptional approach. Examples are relevant, well-delineated, and promote further reader understanding.

10.0 %Utilize the GCU Library to locate at least three relevant, scholarly sources in support of the content.

No outside sources are cited.

Some sources may be cited but they are not scholarly and/or relevant.

At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a loosely connected, vague way.

At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a well-connected way and elaborated on.

At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited and are flawlessly integrated into the essay to support the claims made therein.

20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness

10.0 %Paragraph Development and Transitions

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.

10.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

10.0 %Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.