write my assignment 26325
Can I get assistance please?
My topic is Bioethics.
Bioethics
Reviewing Literature in Bioethics Research: Increasing Rigour in Non-Systematic Reviews.
Images
Authors:
McDougall, Rosalind
Source:
Bioethics (BIOETHICS), Sep2015; 29(7): 523-528. (6p)
Publication Type:
Journal Article – tables/charts
Language:
English
Major Subjects:
BioethicsLiterature Review
Minor Subjects:
Research Methodology; Research Question; Systematic Review; Quality Assessment
Abstract:
The recent interest in systematic review methods in bioethics has highlighted the need for greater transparency in all literature review processes undertaken in bioethics projects. In this article, I articulate features of a good bioethics literature review that does not aim to be systematic, but rather to capture and analyse the key ideas relevant to a research question. I call this a critical interpretive literature review. I begin by sketching and comparing three different types of literature review conducted in bioethics scholarship. Then, drawing on Dixon- Wood’s concept of critical interpretive synthesis, I put forward six features of a good critical interpretive literature review in bioethics: answering a research question, capturing the key ideas relevant to the research question, analysing the literature as a whole, generating theory, not excluding papers based on rigid quality assessment criteria, and reporting the search strategy.
Journal Subset:
Biomedical; Europe; Peer Reviewed; UK & Ireland
ISSN:
0269-9702
MEDLINE Info:
PMID: 25655982 NLM UID: 8704792
Entry Date:
20150810
Revision Date:
20160831
DOI:
http://dx.doi.org.contentproxy.phoenix.edu/10.1111/bioe.12149
Accession Number:
109826269
Publisher Logo:
Images:
"Not answered?"
