As noted in your text, “As a result of the IDEA 2004 regulations, schools are moving toward a more global approach for the identification of students with suspected disabilities through the development of a district-based team. This team may be referred to as the multidisciplinary team (MDT or MET) . . . This team usually comes into operation when the local school-based team (child study team) has conducted a screening and suspects a disability. Once that is determined, then the MDT or MET takes over. This team is mandated by IDEA 2004 so that the child and parents are guaranteed that any comprehensive evaluation be conducted by different professionals to decrease the possibility of subjective and discriminatory assessment.”
Review the “Referral to the Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team (MET) Case Study” to inform the assignment that follows.
After reviewing the case study, reflect upon the following in a 500-750 word essay
Who would be a participant in the MET? What role does each team player hold?
What background information does the case study illustrate that might be significant to the MET?
What objectives or concerns should the MET recommend for evaluation?
What assessment recommendations would you make? Include names of two specific formal and two specific informal assessments. Be sure to identify and describe at least one example that uses technology.
Rationalize your choices citing the case study provided.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located on the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
"Not answered?"
https://acehomeworktutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ace-1.png00Studenthttps://acehomeworktutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ace-1.pngStudent2020-06-24 15:44:342020-06-24 15:44:34Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team
As noted in your text, “As a result of the IDEA 2004 regulations, schools are moving toward a more global approach for the identification of students with suspected disabilities through the development of a district-based team. This team may be referred to as the multidisciplinary team (MDT or MET) . . . This team usually comes into operation when the local school-based team (child study team) has conducted a screening and suspects a disability. Once that is determined, then the MDT or MET takes over. This team is mandated by IDEA 2004 so that the child and parents are guaranteed that any comprehensive evaluation be conducted by different professionals to decrease the possibility of subjective and discriminatory assessment.”
Review the “Referral to the Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team (MET) Case Study” to inform the assignment that follows.
After reviewing the case study, reflect upon the following in a 500-750 word essay
Who would be a participant in the MET? What role does each team player hold?
What background information does the case study illustrate that might be significant to the MET?
What objectives or concerns should the MET recommend for evaluation?
What assessment recommendations would you make? Include names of two specific formal and two specific informal assessments. Be sure to identify and describe at least one example that uses technology.
Rationalize your choices citing the case study provided.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located on the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
"Not answered?"
https://acehomeworktutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ace-1.png00Studenthttps://acehomeworktutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ace-1.pngStudent2020-06-24 15:44:342020-06-24 15:44:34Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team
As noted in your text, “As a result of the IDEA 2004 regulations, schools are moving toward a more global approach for the identification of students with suspected disabilities through the development of a district-based team. This team may be referred to as the multidisciplinary team (MDT or MET) . . . This team usually comes into operation when the local school-based team (child study team) has conducted a screening and suspects a disability. Once that is determined, then the MDT or MET takes over. This team is mandated by IDEA 2004 so that the child and parents are guaranteed that any comprehensive evaluation be conducted by different professionals to decrease the possibility of subjective and discriminatory assessment.”
Review the “Referral to the Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team (MET) Case Study” to inform the assignment that follows.
After reviewing the case study, reflect upon the following in a 500-750 word essay
Who would be a participant in the MET? What role does each team player hold?
What background information does the case study illustrate that might be significant to the MET?
What objectives or concerns should the MET recommend for evaluation?
What assessment recommendations would you make? Include names of two specific formal and two specific informal assessments. Be sure to identify and describe at least one example that uses technology.
Rationalize your choices citing the case study provided.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located on the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
"Not answered?"
https://acehomeworktutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ace-1.png00Studenthttps://acehomeworktutors.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/ace-1.pngStudent2020-06-24 15:44:342020-06-24 15:44:34Multidisciplinary Evaluation Team
The topic of your essay needs to be a global societal problem from the following list:
Aging population
Critical Thinking Skills for the 21st Century
Gender Inequality
Global Climate Change
Global Water Shortage
Marginalization and Minorities
Refugee Crises
Children’s Rights
Social Media Censorship
Reflect: Based on the topic that you have chosen, you will need to use critical thinking skills to thoroughly understand how this topic can be a global societal problem and determine some logical solutions to the problem.
Write: This Final Paper, an argumentative essay, will present research relating the critical thinker to the modern, globalized world. In this assignment, you need to address the items below in separate sections with new headings for each. In your paper,
Identify the global societal problem within the introductory paragraph.
Describe background information on how that problem developed or came into existence.
Show why this is a societal problem.
Provide perspectives from multiple disciplines or populations so that you fully represent what different parts of society have to say about this issue.
Construct an argument supporting your proposed solutions, considering multiple disciplines or populations so that your solution shows that multiple parts of society will benefit from this solution.
Provide evidence from multiple scholarly sources as evidence that your proposed solution is viable.
Interpret statistical data from at least three, peer-reviewed scholarly sources within your argument.
Discuss the validity, reliability, and any biases.
Identify the strengths and weaknesses of these sources, pointing out limitations of current research and attempting to indicate areas for future research. (You may even use visual representations such as graphs or charts to explain statistics from sources.)
Evaluate the ethical outcomes that result from your solution.
Provide at least one positive ethical outcome as well as at least one negative ethical outcome that could result from your solution.
Explain at least two ethical issues related to each of those outcomes. (It is important to consider all of society.)
The Global Societal Problem, Argument, and Solution
Must be 1,750 to 2,250 words in length (approximately between seven and nine pages; not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style, as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Must include an introduction and conclusion paragraph. Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.
Multimedia sources (such as videos) may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. If multimedia sources are used, they must be authored and distributed by credible sources, such as universities, law schools, medical schools, or professors, or found in the Ashford University Library.
Government sources may be used, but no more than two such sources may be used. Examples include whitehouse.gov, state.gov, usa.gov, cdc.gov, and so forth. These websites can be used to make a stronger point about your proposed solution within the argument.
Where print documents are used for source materials, those must be peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles, and academically published books. Popular media sources (e.g., newspapers, magazines, television and radio shows, etc.) must not be used. Materials from advocacy groups (e.g., Greenpeace, Human Rights Campaign, National Organization for Women, etc.) must not be used.
Sites such as ProCon.org and Wikipedia must not be used.
Must have no more than 15% quoted material in the body of your essay based on the Turnitin report. References list will be excluded from the Turnitin originality score.
\Your paper should include academic sources that explain multiple sides of the issue.
Your interpretations of the evidence should be objective and state the conclusions and theses presented in the evidence clearly and fairly.
Your paper should place the various forms of evidence in relation to one another and demonstrate why one form or perspective is stronger than the other positions that one could take on the issue.
Your paper should point out the limitations of current evidence and attempt to indicate areas for future research.
