Entries by Student

write my assignment 28061

Provide a 2 pages analysis while answering the following question: A Parole Evidence Rule. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide. An abstract is required. Question What is the purpose of parole evidence rule? Parole evidence rule s that any words whether written or oral outside the original contract cannot be admitted in court regarding a dispute over the contract. The purpose of this rule is to support the strength of a contract made between two parties. Thus, a completely integrated contract is viewed as the best evidence of the agreement between the two parties (Cheeseman, 2009).

Question # 2: Would it be better to simply allow all parole evidence in as evidence and leave it up to the jury?

The jury tends to be biased at times. Since they are human, they would tend to relate their personal experience to the case at hand. Thus, giving them information not stated in the contract might interfere with their ruling and judgment. Extra information could be created to gain advantage by one party over the other whether written or oral. It is not professionally advisable to allow parole evidence in case as evidence (Cheeseman, 2009).

Question # 3: How much weight to give to the evidence?

Although parole evidence should not be made accessible to the jury, it should be given some consideration .Contracts at times tend to miss situations, which arise later in business and often people make agreements not expressed in the contract. Thus, exceptions already made for the parole evidence should be revised on wider and broader situations. In direct reference to the text, it is important to understand the different meaning evidence would be interpreted into depending on the context. The contexts of words have varied meaning depending on the circumstances under which they are used (Cheeseman, 2009).

Question # 4: Would this be better than not allowing the jury to see the evidence at all?

This would be better. Giving the parole evidence some sort of strength during a contract dispute hearing makes much sense than allowing the jury to see the evidence. Since it was meant not to be seen by the jury and that part should remain as it is (Cheeseman, 2009).

Question # 5: What advantages and disadvantages would there be to eliminating the parole evidence rule?

a)Advantages

It will give the jury a broader perspective of what the situation really is and instead of being sternly directed by an agreement that might have been written ages ago. the jury can make a judgment while relating to the current situation (Cheeseman, 2009).

b) Disadvantages

It will be difficult to make decisions as people would come up with words often made up and not part of the conversation between the two parties to use in court. The jury not well versed with the law might actually believe what they are told as they act more on emotions that reality(Cheeseman, 2009).

Reference

Cheeseman, H. R. (2009). Business Law: Legal Environment, Online Commerce, Business Ethics, and International Issues. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 2578

Evidence of nonrandom differences in group means occurs when the variance between groups is __________ the variance within groups.Why are scatterplots necessary when investigating the relationship between quantitative variables?r is always greater than or equal to _____ and less than or equal to _____. Perfect negative association is present when r = _____. Perfect positive association is present when r = _____. Between r = -0.56 and r = +0.46, the stronger correlation is _____.Besides linearity, what conditions are needed to infer population slope β (3 more conditions)? Besides linearity, what conditions are needed to infer population correlation coefficient ρ (2 more conditions)?

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 13607

There have been many theories regarding how the pyramids at Giza were constructed. Most experts agree that they were constructed as burial monuments for pharaohs, but “how” these ancient people constructed monuments of such great size without modern machinery is a mystery which is still being debated.   

Write a three to four (3-4) paragraph essay in which you adequately address the topic above.   

  1. Clearly state the “mystery” and provide a brief summary of at least two (2) reasonable and scholarly theories which could explain the mystery. Because some theories may sound far-fetched, include the source or promoter of each theory – such as a scientist, a historian, a theologian, etc.
  2. After summarizing at least two (2) scholarly theories, identify one (1) of the theories as the most plausible and provide at least two (2) convincing reasons why the theory you have chosen is the best one to explain the mystery. This will involve some critical reasoning skills on your part.
  3. Use at least two (2) sources plus the class textbook. (Three [3] sources total as the minimum) Note: Wikipedia and other similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources. You are highly encouraged to use the Resource Center tab at the top of your Blackboard page

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 7345

  1.     Insufficient information to compute Consider three investors in Stock A:

Mr. Single invests for 1 year

Ms Double invests for 2 years

Mrs. Triple invests for 3 years

Which of the following statements are true? (Hint: Recall what the basic stock valuation principle is.)

a.     Mrs. Triple would place the highest value on Stock A because she is investing for the longest time.

b.    Ms. Double would place the second highest value on Stock A because she is investing for the second longest time.

c.     Mr. Single would place the lowest value on Stock A because he is investing for the shortest time. all of the above are true

d.    Mr. Single, Ms. Double, and Mrs. Triple would all place the same value on Stock A

e.     none of the above are true 

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer