Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on Humanitarian Ethics. It needs to be at least 750 words.

In this meaning, the antonym is “amoral”, indicating an inability to distinguish between right and wrong. The second denotes the active practice of those values. In this sense, the antonym is “immoral”, referring to actions that violate ethical principles.

Personal ethics signifies a moral code applicable to individuals, while social ethics means moral theory applied to groups. Social ethics can be synonymous with social and political philosophy, in as much as it is the foundation of a good society or state.

This moral power in man involving the exercise of man’s greatest endowments of freedom, rights and duties, is a most distinctive feature of the human personality. Much as the spirit, the soul giverns and permeates the whole human body in a human person, so this moral prerogative of man prevails over, permeates and pervades the whole totality of human activity. While all other aspects of human life may be confined and categorized into separate compartments, this moral characteristic of man transcends, penetrates and invades all compartments of human living, all phases of human endeavor. For man is principally and primarily a human person whose highest faculty is his moral power, his willpower, his freedom.

Hence, there cannot be, for instance, in the practical world of human affairs such a thing as purely economic matter, a purely political problem or question, a pure artistic undertaking, and the like – entirely apart from and independent of all moral connections and considerations.

Much of the present day problems rising from conflicting claims of authority and powers, when seen in the light of the explained postulate of the primacy of the spirit and morality disappear or point to their own solutions.

Unfortunately, because of the crassly materialistic temper and tenor of our times, the moral angle is often overlooked, moral authority is often bypassed or

Hank writes a book on business writing called Writing Right: Business Writing 101. It is a 10-chapter book, and each chapter is 20 pages in length. The book is a new release and an instant New York Times best seller. The dust jacket of the book claims: “An essential buy for anyone working in the corporate environment – Hank is a master at providing you with the tools for self-training. Your boss will see instant change in your writing style.” An accompanying CD-Rom includes a 30-minute lecture in which Hank discusses writing style and knowing your audience.

Min is a manager at a 100-person firm that provides business consultation to outside companies. Dismayed at the poor writing skills her employees use when communicating with clients, Min decides to hold an in-house professional development seminar on writing. In preparation, she reads Hank’s book and two others on the topic. She photocopies three chapters from Hank’s book that she found particularly helpful. She creates a cover page that states the author, title, and publisher of the book and binds it to the three copied chapters with a single staple. She does not alter the work in any other way. 

Prior to the seminar, she provides the packet to each employee with the instructions: “Please read and be prepared to discuss for Friday’s writing workshop.” During the seminars, she plays the entire lecture by Hank on a television in the conference room.

Min wants to ensure that her presentation does not violate any intellectual property laws. She asks you to prepare a brief presentation that outlines the applicable law, evaluates her current practices under that law, considers alternatives, and makes a recommendation regarding whether she can continue to use the materials and, if so, in what fashion. She also wants to know if she can copyright her presentation and what she needs to do if she elects to do so.