Entries by Student

write my assignment 28557

Today, it is clear that evidence-based practice continues to result in tremendous patient outcomes.  Melynk and Fineout-Overholt (2015) discuss that as with any scope of the healthcare field, evidenced-based practices heighten ethical concerns.  Some of the ambitions hidden in the advancement of evidence-based practice are, at the core, ethical (p. 515).  However, it is critical to consistently ensure the protection of personal rights in those subjects involved in research studies.  

Methods  

In order to protect the personal rights of human subjects involved in research studies, it is vital for providers to be aware of the federal regulations and policies that are in place.  Bierer, Barnes, and Lynch (2017) explain that the research with human subjects is funded by federal agencies and is controlled by a set of regulations and methods that were created in order to protect study participants while facilitating the advancement of research (p. 784).  These federal regulations assist in protecting basic human rights, such as beneficence, and help in defending vulnerable populations from experiencing harm.  Furthermore, the Institutional Review Board must grant approval for the research study to commence.  Bierer, Barnes, and Lynch (2017) explain that the Institutional Review Board must meticulously review the ethics and appropriateness of a proposed research project and the participation of the enlisted human subjects (p. 786).  

It is also essential to identify vulnerable human subjects that are involved in a research project.  Clark and Preto (2018) discuss that vulnerability has emerged and is identified in research as one’s inability to defend one’s own best interests, awareness to harm, and various determinants to one’s determinants of health (p. 308).  Providing patients with a thorough education and pertinent handouts regarding the details of the study is key.  Bierer, Barnes, and Lynch (2017) explain that individuals that are registered in a research study must be given a comprehensive understanding of the risks, benefits, and other pertinent information (p. 784).  

Conclusion 

It is critical to consistently ensure the protection of personal rights of those individuals enlisted in a research project.  Davis (2018) emphasizes that in order to protect human participants in research, organizations must follow policies for the protection of human research subjects.  Regardless of whether research takes place in medical or private facilities, human subject protection can only be guaranteed if the Institutional Review Board closely oversees the research it has approved (p. 92).  

References 

Bierer, B. E., Barnes, M., & Lynch, H. F. (2017). Revised ‘common rule’ shapes protection for 

              research participants. Health Affairs, 36(5), 784-788. 

Clark, B., & Preto, N. (2018). Exploring the concept of vulnerability in healthcare. Canadian 

Medical Association Journal, 190(11), 308-309. 

Davis, S. (2018). Monitoring of approved studies: A difficult tightrope walk by ethics 

              committees. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 9(2), 91-94. 

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2015). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: 

A guide to best practice (3rd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer Health.  

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 18015

Lab Assignment 3: Storyboarding

Due Week 3 and worth 40 points

Deliverables: Storyboard Document depicting diagrams and descriptions (Web pages not necessary).

Complete the weekly lab based on the following:

  • Write the code for each lab assignment.
  • The code is to be submitted in a single compressed folder (zip file) to the online course shell. The file must contain all .htm files, along with any other files that may be necessary for your project to run (ex: text files, images, etc.). 
  • When saving the file, it should be saved as Lab_#_Last name_First initial.htm. For example, if your name is Mary Smith the file for Lab 1 should be saved as Lab_1_Smith_M.htm
  • Any and all written answers must be entered into the online course shell with the submission of the attached lab assignment.

Follow the directions below to complete Lab Assignment 3:

  1. Create a storyboard for a four (4) page Website (one (1) home page and three (3) sub pages) and one (1) Cascading Style Sheet (.css). Using Microsoft Word, Microsoft Visio, or Dia, create a diagram of the layout and navigation structure.
  2. Explain the effects that the Cascading Style Sheet (.css) will have on the Web page. There must be a minimum of two (2) changes. Be sure to include detail. (Example: The Cascading Style Sheet (.css) will make the background color grey and change all H1 font to blue.) 
  3. Describe what the home page will look like. (Will it have text? Will it have headings? Will it have an image? Etc.)
  4. Describe what the first, second, and third sub pages will look like. (Will they have text? Will they have headings? Will they have images? Etc.)

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 6892

Complete 1 page APA formatted essay: WGS 10.

For instance a good action cannot be termed as worth, since its main aim is control (Kirk & Okazawa-Rey 481-482). It is this process of militarization that will put the lives of many women at high levels of risk since their rights will be products of the militarization process.

In Gender and Human Security, it is evident that the global security is changing with the time (Kirk & Okazawa-Rey 500-501). In this perspective, it is of essence to come up with mechanisms that will allow for security response system that will look into the needs of all persons and more so women who are likely to suffer from different forms of violence such as sexual violence that affects their general well-being. Crimes based on gender perspectives continue to increase. thus, calls for quick measures to alleviate the

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 5594

A contemporary example of spin doctoring relates to the claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, which was the original rationale for the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003. When the intelligence about weapons of mass destruction proved to be faulty, the debate was quickly and skillfully shifted by spin doctors to a humanitarian argument that the Iraqi people must be freed from the clutches Saddam Hussein the ruthless dictator. While no evidence of weapons of mass destruction could be found, mass graves of Iraqi citizens killed at the behest of Saddam Hussein could be found and thus, legitimate the invasion.Use critical thinking to analyze the following three questions relating to aspects of persuasion. Specifically utilized the particular course concept or concepts stated in each question

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer