Entries by Student

write my assignment 11150

Tragedy Across the Mediterranean: Consider “The Tale of Sohrab” from the Shahnameh in comparison to Oedipus Tyrannus from the Week 2 readings. Make an argument about whether the two works are more alike or different and why. Focus your thesis on one particular aspect of the two works such as protagonists, themes, central conflicts, or other another element that you see as important.

This essay should be a 600-900 word essay focusing on the assigned readings from the course. 

  • This should be a close reading essay, and should use as evidence primarily passages from the work or works that you discuss. You may not use ANY outside sources without the instructor’s approval.

  • The essay should be in MLA essay format and use MLA citations. A works cited entry and in-text citations for each text discussed are required.

  • Analytical essays should be focused on making a debatable claim about the work in question. Informational essays or essays consisting of summary are not appropriate for either type of essay.

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 3758

Note molar heat of evaporation for a sub-stance is how much heat is needed to vaporizea mole of that substance.Which statement about intermolecularforces in liquids is FALSE?1. The weaker the intermolecular forces, thelower the surface tension.2. The stronger the intermolecular forces,the lower the boiling point.3. The stronger the intermolecular forces,the greater the molar heat of vaporization.4. The greater the intermolecular forces, thelower the vapor pressure.5. The weaker the intermolecular forces, themore rapid the evaporation rate.

Note molar heat of evaporation for a substance is how much heat is needed to vaporizea mole of that substance.Which statement about intermolecularforces in liquids is FALSE?1. The weaker the…

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 23458

I need some assistance with these assignment. accounting for managers Thank you in advance for the help! More importantly, financial ratios are there due to the level that is divided by a financial flow itself which could be in the form of price or in simple plain accounting practices, the earnings. On the contrary, the financial ratios are also possible due to the flow that goes on to divide the same by a level that comprises of the return on equity or the earnings itself with respect to the equity. Now when we talk about the differences between the public sector organizations and that of the private sector we need to outline the exact stakeholders and investors who have one claim or the other within the said company’s shares and assets. For this to happen, one should comprehend that public sector organizations are open to accountability and audit in front of one and all but the private sector concerns are more or less within the four walls of the company, and their revenues, shares, and assets are not disclosed that easily. In fact, there is no provision whatsoever to discuss the liquidity basis and the like when the talk goes out loud of the financial reporting mechanisms related to the private sector organizations.

In calculating financial ratios of a public or a private sector organization, one must fathom that the numerator or the denominator at any point in time might just be the ratio, remarked as the PEG ratio. This is quite true that in terms of financial ratios, the ratio analysis has got its due part in telling one and all about the whole category and as such the industry. On the other hand, there are a number of important pointers that one can pick with regards to the theory of ratios for that matter. Let us start with the financial ratios. These are the flags that in essence lay the foundation for showing those areas that can be remarked as the ones having strengths or weaknesses, both within the realms of the private and the public sector concerns. For this point in the case, even more, than one ratio can eventually be quite misleading.

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 25952

Directions: In a thesis-driven essay of a few paragraphs, choose two of the following prompts, and evaluate the logic. Remember to identify the premises and conclusions of the argument in question (you may need to recall supporting details from your reading, since the following are extracts from the reading). Give specific arguments for why you find these premises and/or conclusions convincing, or whether you think they fail to persuade.  

  1. “This mechanism being observed… the inference, we think, is inevitable, that the watch must have a maker… Every indication of contrivance, every manifestation of design, which existed in the watch, exists in the works of nature; with the difference, on the side of nature, of being greater and more, and that in a degree which exceeds all computation.” 

-William Paley 

  1. “… A rational noetic structure may very well contain belief in God among its foundations… a Christian ought not to believe in God on the basis of other propositions; a proper and well-formed Christian noetic structure will in fact have belief in God among its foundations… one can rationally accept belief in God as basic… one can know that God exists even if he has no argument, even if he does not believe on the basis of other propositions…. One needs no arguments to know that God exists.”  

-Alvin Plantinga 

  1. “…from the standpoint of religious faith, the only reasonable hypothesis is that this historical picture represents a movement of divine self-revelation to mankind… [Religions are] all, at their experiential roots, in contact with the same ultimate reality, but their differing experiences of that reality, interacting over the centuries with the different thought-forms of different cultures, have led to increasing differentiation and contrasting elaboration…” 

-John Hick 

  1. “Our passional nature not only lawfully may, but must, decide an option between propositions, whenever it is a genuine option that cannot be decided on intellectual grounds; for to say, under such circumstances, ‘Do not decide, but leave the question open,’ is itself a passional decision—just like deciding yes and no—and is attended with the same risk of losing the truth.” 

-William James 

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer