Need an research paper on ethical dilemma executive summary. Needs to be 4 pages. Please no plagiarism. It is something which is very common in public sector and law enforcement firms, yet as a responsible citizen and police officer it is my duty to take necessary actions to stop this practice. As I am transferred to the current police department only recently, I must not show impatience in reporting the misconduct done by any colleague/police officer. I will secretly collect necessary facts and gather the past records of that officer on my own. I will wait till the time I have strong evidence that supports my claim. However, since that officer has strong connections and has established goodwill and PR among influential people while on the other hand, I have not yet built the integrity and trust which is required to challenge an experienced officer. Therefore, in this case I have several options: I will find out the name and designation of his immediate supervisor or the person whom he reports to. and I will quietly collect his/her views about bribery. I can send an anonymous letter to the internal affairs office of the police department which is responsible to carry out investigation about any misconduct or police abuse. Many countries have state police posts that can be used to report the cases of corruption. However, in case there is extreme violation of law, I will have to take serious actions by reporting anonymously to public safety board which deals with officer’s disciplinary actions and police corruption. Otherwise, I will try to find local FBI near my department from their official website i.e. http:// If the issue is not yet resolved then I will write an anonymous letter to the editor of the local newspaper and will send him/her the police disciplinary records because when media is involved serious efforts are made by concerned authorities to investigate the claims of corruption and breach of employment code of conduct. The professional implications of police reporting can be very serious especially when one is reporting against some big fishes of the police department. In such situation following consequences may occur: If my name is revealed, my job will be at risk or perhaps I will be transferred to some other department/city. I may receive threats and the security of my family can be endangered. Police officer can send me behind the bars by putting false accusations against me or due to some false disciplinary charges. There are two ways to deal with these consequences. first is to report the corruption claims to the most trusted authority that ensures that my identity will not be revealed under any circumstance. Second condition is to challenge on the basis of strong evidence, public support and recordings of victims. Some countries use the tactic of “mystery audit” in which some senior police officials or people from investigating agencies disguise as common people and go to the police department for filing a complaint. They talk to the officers who are the suspects of corruption and create a situation of offering bribe or gifts. If officer(s) accept the bribe then the suspect is caught red handed. This method is very successful for conducting unbiased investigation. On the other hand, the liabilities of not reporting such acts are much greater than the consequences of reporting those acts. When an officer breaches the law, its impacts are not seen on the individual or departmental level only, rather it affects the whole system.

Russia & China negotiators often open up with the extreme positions. Swedish people on the contrary have often been prepared towards starting with what they would achieve. Negotiators from East have been quite different. They have been much more focus on whole view at very end apart from making the incremental decisions. Americans may take the contracts quite seriously however that has not been a case with Russians. Japanese on the contrary may consider a contract the insult as its relationship as well as also businesses has been dependent on the social trust.

Hi Elsie – Good start on your “Main Post“. I agree that “Relationship Building” is important, but how would you go about “getting to know one’s contacts in a host country and building mutual trust“? Also, as a stage in the “Negotiation Process“, relationship building is number two right after “Preparation” and right before “Exchanging Task-Related Information“. What does this indicate in the scheme of things? Please share.

Professor O’Bryant

How culture impacts relations in businessDiscuss the stages in the negotiation process and how culturally based value systemsinfluence these stages.The five interrelated phases in the…