can you do this for me

Case Assignments Instructions

You will write a Case Assignments based on the “NCRCC: Teeing Up a New Strategic Direction” case study. Each Case Assignment must be 750–1,000 words and use current APA format with a cover page, 1” margins, 12-point font, content, in-text citations, and a reference page (the word count does not include the questions, cover page, or reference page). No abstract is required; simply type the questions as headings and respond. In addition, you must incorporate 2–4 scholarly research articles in your response.

· Case Assignment 4 will answer case discussion questions 8–9

Submit Case Assignments 4 by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday of the assigned module/week.

BUSI600 Case Assignment Grading Rubric 90 points

Content – 70%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Case   Analysis

18 to 20   points

Insightful throughout. Completely developed all   relevant information. Critical issues and key problems that supported the   Case Analysis were clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.

17 points

Specific, solid. Less carefully developed. Some   insights. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis   were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.

1 to 16   points

Vague, obvious, underdeveloped, or too broad. One or   more main issues not identified. Limited evidence of critical thinking. Critical   issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were not clearly   identified, analyzed, and supported.

0   points

Several main issues not identified. Oversimplified,   vague, unclear, or cannot be understood. Little or no evidence of critical   thinking. Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis   were poorly identified, analyzed, and supported.

Synthesis   of course theories/ concepts and case analysis

18 to 20   points

Convincingly interpreted and   linked to course theories/ concepts. Considers context and limits of position   where appropriate. Key points were clearly identified and supported with a   well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical   frameworks to the data provided in the case.

17 points

Relevant. Appropriately   interpreted and linked to main course theories/concepts. Key points were   partially identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on   applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in   the case.

1 to 16   points

A few generalized connections made to course   theories/concepts. Connections not clearly linked to case. Key points were   not identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on   applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in   the case.

0   points

No clear connections between the facts of the case   and relevant theories/concepts. Key points were poorly identified and   supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific   concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.

Application   of Scholarly Research

21 to 23   points

Author accurately applied 4 or more scholarly (peer   reviewed) sources.

19 to 20   points

Author accurately applied at least 3 scholarly (peer   reviewed) sources.

1 to 18   points

Author accurately applied 1 or 2 scholarly (peer   reviewed) sources.

0   points

Author did not apply scholarly (peer reviewed)   sources.

Structure – 30%

Advanced

Proficient

Developing

Not present

Mechanics

9 points

Correct spelling and grammar are used throughout the   essay. There are 0–1 errors in grammar or spelling that distract the reader   from the content.

8 points

There are 2-3 errors in grammar or spelling that   distract the reader from the content.

1 to 7   points

There are more than 3 errors in grammar or spelling   that distract the reader from the content.

0   points

There are more than 5 errors in the grammar or   spelling that distract the reader from the content.

APA   Style

9 points

There are 0–1 minor errors in APA format in the required   items: title page, running head, font   type and size, line spacing, headings, citations, and references.

8 points

There are 2–3 minor errors in APA format in the   required items.

1 to 7   points

There are more than 3 errors in APA format in the   required items.

0   points

A title page is not present and/or there are more   than 5 errors in APA format in the required items.

Word   Count

9 points

The minimum word count of 750 words is met or   exceeded. Excluding the cover page and   References page(s).

8 points

The word count of 700 words is met. Excluding the cover page and References   page(s).

1 to 7   points

The word count of 650 words is met. Excluding the cover page and References   page(s).

0   points

There are fewer than 650 words. Excluding the cover page and References   page(s).

Total

Professor   Comments:

Compose a 1750 words essay on Final Human Resource Management Paper. Needs to be plagiarism free!

In order to achieve those organizational goals there should be a very good leadership style in organizational environment. There are many different leadership styles in the modern business world and almost every one of them has a particular reason or reasons for its existence. According to Burns (1978) transformational leadership has a set of category constructs such as values, morals, farsightedness, long term goals, principles, acute awareness about the dividing line between causes and symptoms, mission statements, strategic perspectives and human resources. Transformational leadership is primarily and immediately concerned with winning the support of those subordinates to achieve predefined organizational goals. While many such objectives are not realized in the short run due to a variety of reasons such as inadequate planning and wrong forecasts about cash flow, sales revenue and profits, there can be some recovery in the long term. Transformational leader seeks with fervent hope to inculcate a sense of responsibility and pride in achievements among the subordinates. A critical theoretical perspective that has been developed on this particular aspect looks at the transformational leader’s attitude towards hisher subordinates as power-sharing partners whose contribution to the productive process is rewarded with acknowledgment.

However according to the leadership style in People Express it was centered on a hybrid model of the time, i.e. a good admixture of people orientation and share ownership in the company would motivate the average employee to perform better. The former is directly related to the transactional leadership theory while the latter is linked to the then populist ideological concept of ‘share owning democracy’ ( Neither of them worked. Instead Burr should have focused on the very management and organizational culture at People Express. For instance he