Answered>Order 27503
ASSIGNMENT 1
Using this week’s Field Experience A assignment, create a lesson plan, using the “COE Lesson Plan Template,” outlining your changes and preferences for the lesson you observed. In parenthesis in each section, explain your different rationale. Be sure to include a theory of instruction.
The lesson plan should include the following:
- A formative assessment tool to determine the needs of the students prior to learning.
- Three instructional objectives aligned to your state standards.
- A variety of instructional strategies to teach three learning objectives.
- A summative (standards-based) assessment to evaluate the students’ level of understanding at the end of the unit.
- An opportunity for the students to provide feedback on their learning process throughout the lesson.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
RUBRIC- Field Experience A: Identifying Instructional Strategies
1No Submission0.00%
2Insufficient69.00%
3Approaching74.00%
4Acceptable87.00%
5Target100.00%
100.0 %Criteria
15.0 %Summary: Theory or Statement in Classroom
No submission
The summary does not identify a theory or strategy used in the classroom. Examples of theory or strategy are not provided.
The summary inadequately identifies a theory or strategy used in the classroom. Examples of theory or strategy are inadequately provided.
The summary clearly identifies a theory or strategy used in the classroom. Examples of theory or strategy are provided.
The summary skillfully and concisely identifies a theory or strategy used in the classroom. Examples of theory or strategy are provided.
15.0 %Summary: Content Standards Associated with Learning Objectives
No submission
The summary does not identify content standards associated with learning objectives.
The summary inadequately identifies content standards associated with learning objectives.
The summary clearly identifies content standards associated with learning objectives.
The summary skillfully and concisely identifies content standards associated with learning objectives.
15.0 %Summary: Inquiry and Notes of Assessments Attached to Strategies
No submission
The summary does not describe inquiry and notes about assessments attached to strategies.
The summary inadequately describes inquiry and notes about assessments attached to strategies.
The summary clearly describes inquiry and notes about assessments attached to strategies.
The summary skillfully and concisely describes inquiry and notes about assessments attached to strategies.
15.0 %Summary: Identification of Accommodations and Strategies for Differentiated and Informal Instruction
No submission
The summary does not identify accommodations and strategies to fulfill differentiated and or informal instruction.
The summary inadequately identifies accommodations and strategies to fulfill differentiated and or informal instruction.
The summary clearly identifies accommodations and strategies to fulfill differentiated and or informal instruction.
The summary skillfully and concisely identifies accommodations and strategies to fulfill differentiated and or informal instruction.
15.0 %Summary: Inquiry of Rationale
No submission
The summary does not describe inquiry of mentor teacher?s rationale for lesson, strategies, and assessments.
The summary inadequately describes inquiry of mentor teacher?s rationale for lesson, strategies, and assessments.
The summary clearly describes inquiry of mentor teacher?s rationale for lesson, strategies, and assessments.
The summary skillfully and concisely describes inquiry of mentor teacher?s rationale for lesson, strategies, and assessments.
10.0 %Organization
No submission
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. Argument is illogical. Conclusion does not support the claims made.
Purpose statement is vague, and claims do not thoroughly support it. Argument and conclusion are orderly but present unconvincing justification of claims.
Purpose statement and conclusion are clear. Argument shows logical progression. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion.
Purpose statement and related conclusion are clear and convincing. Information is well-organized and logical. Argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
15.0 %Mechanics
No submission
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is lacking.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as some practice and content-related language.
Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
100 %Total Weightage
due 09/05/18
Assignment 2
Allocate at least 5 hours in the field to support this field experience.
Choose the secondary grade level and content area you selected for your notebook in Topic 1. Observe and interview your mentor teacher using the following points:
- Identify theory/strategy used in the classroom. Provide examples of the strategies.
- Identify content standards associated with learning objectives.
- Inquire and note any assessments attached to the strategies.
- Identify any accommodations and strategies to fulfill differentiated/informal instruction.
- Inquire about the rationale for the mentor teacher’s lesson. Include a discussion about strategies and applicable assessments.
Once you have completed your field experience, summarize and reflect upon your interview and observations in 250-500 words, comparing your observation notes to each teacher’s instructional choices for the lessons observed. Inform your mentor teacher of your intent to teach a lesson during Topic 4. Add to your digital notebook as necessary.
APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.
This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Document the hours and locations that you spend in the field on your Clinical Field Experience Verification Form.
Submit the Clinical Field Experience Verification Form to LoudCloud in the last topic. Directions for submitting can be found on the College of Education site in the Student Success Center.
RUBRIC- Field Experience A: Identifying Instructional Strategies
1No Submission0.00%
2Insufficient69.00%
3Approaching74.00%
4Acceptable87.00%
5Target100.00%
100.0 %Criteria
15.0 %Summary: Theory or Statement in Classroom
No submission
The summary does not identify a theory or strategy used in the classroom. Examples of theory or strategy are not provided.
The summary inadequately identifies a theory or strategy used in the classroom. Examples of theory or strategy are inadequately provided.
The summary clearly identifies a theory or strategy used in the classroom. Examples of theory or strategy are provided.
The summary skillfully and concisely identifies a theory or strategy used in the classroom. Examples of theory or strategy are provided.
15.0 %Summary: Content Standards Associated with Learning Objectives
No submission
The summary does not identify content standards associated with learning objectives.
The summary inadequately identifies content standards associated with learning objectives.
The summary clearly identifies content standards associated with learning objectives.
The summary skillfully and concisely identifies content standards associated with learning objectives.
15.0 %Summary: Inquiry and Notes of Assessments Attached to Strategies
No submission
The summary does not describe inquiry and notes about assessments attached to strategies.
The summary inadequately describes inquiry and notes about assessments attached to strategies.
The summary clearly describes inquiry and notes about assessments attached to strategies.
The summary skillfully and concisely describes inquiry and notes about assessments attached to strategies.
15.0 %Summary: Identification of Accommodations and Strategies for Differentiated and Informal Instruction
No submission
The summary does not identify accommodations and strategies to fulfill differentiated and or informal instruction.
The summary inadequately identifies accommodations and strategies to fulfill differentiated and or informal instruction.
The summary clearly identifies accommodations and strategies to fulfill differentiated and or informal instruction.
The summary skillfully and concisely identifies accommodations and strategies to fulfill differentiated and or informal instruction.
15.0 %Summary: Inquiry of Rationale
No submission
The summary does not describe inquiry of mentor teacher?s rationale for lesson, strategies, and assessments.
The summary inadequately describes inquiry of mentor teacher?s rationale for lesson, strategies, and assessments.
The summary clearly describes inquiry of mentor teacher?s rationale for lesson, strategies, and assessments.
The summary skillfully and concisely describes inquiry of mentor teacher?s rationale for lesson, strategies, and assessments.
10.0 %Organization
No submission
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. Argument is illogical. Conclusion does not support the claims made.
Purpose statement is vague, and claims do not thoroughly support it. Argument and conclusion are orderly but present unconvincing justification of claims.
Purpose statement and conclusion are clear. Argument shows logical progression. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion.
Purpose statement and related conclusion are clear and convincing. Information is well-organized and logical. Argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner.
15.0 %Mechanics
No submission
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is lacking.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as some practice and content-related language.
Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.
100 %Total Weightage
Respond TO ASSIGNMENT UNDER CONTENT AREA OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS CLASS of a Language Arts class Please. BOTH ASSIGNMENT DUE DUE 09/05/18
"Not answered?"
