Answered>Order 26807

I will pay for the following essay Theories of Self-Concept Maintenance. The essay is to be 3 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

Download file to see previous pages…

She says she has been&nbsp.extremely&nbsp.busy, and that has not had time to work with the other departments. In her defence, she states that other people are not interested in what she is doing, and she is a silent observer. In addition, she blames others for a mistake and asserts herself as an expert.&nbsp.In her view, things would have been different if she did the&nbsp.task. When the&nbsp.boss&nbsp.praises both women on planning and prioritizing, exaggerates her ways of planning so as to seek admiration from the boss. Moreover, she wants to&nbsp.exert&nbsp.the&nbsp.notion&nbsp.that her planning and prioritizing skills have been of immense significance to the company. Jeanette is so confident of her work that when she does not receive a&nbsp.perfect&nbsp.five&nbsp.score, it certainly affects her&nbsp.self-esteem. Thus, she wants to work extra hard to show that she is the best. Hormuth (2010) states the three theories of self-concept&nbsp.maintenance&nbsp.as self-evaluation theory, self-discrepancy theory and affective forecasting&nbsp.theory. These theories focus on the ways in which self-concept affect how different individuals&nbsp.feel&nbsp.about themselves. The theories can be used to&nbsp.explain&nbsp.the different behaviours an individual exhibits in presentation, monitoring and regulation when placed in social situations. People&nbsp.are&nbsp.always concerned&nbsp.with their appropriate self-presentation, which&nbsp.is ruled&nbsp.by the individual’s self&nbsp.concept&nbsp.that is an&nbsp.invariable consideration. The theories also&nbsp.explore&nbsp.the cognitive representation of the self, and how the&nbsp.knowledge&nbsp.people have regarded themselves affects their&nbsp.association&nbsp.and&nbsp.behaviour. Self-evaluation&nbsp.theory&nbsp.explores the relationship between self performance and another&nbsp.individual’s performance in relation to areas that&nbsp.are deemed&nbsp.of high relevance. When another&nbsp.worker&nbsp.performs better than a person in an area of high relevance. this may result in the reduction of the person’s&nbsp.self-esteem. Affective forecasting&nbsp.theory&nbsp.explores the various ways in which individuals attempt to predict their prospects and how they will make them feel. People with high&nbsp.self-esteem&nbsp.usually&nbsp.exhibit&nbsp.a more positive attitude regarding their capabilities to achieve their objectives and stay on top (Schwartz, 2011). Self-discrepancy&nbsp.theory&nbsp.examines the three sides of self: ought self, the actual and the&nbsp.ideal&nbsp.self. This theory asserts that the difference between the&nbsp.ideal&nbsp.self and actual&nbsp.self develops a sense of failure in achieving objectives and usually forecasts&nbsp.depression. Baumeister and Finkel (2010) note that discrepancies between the ought&nbsp.self&nbsp.and&nbsp.actual&nbsp.self concentrates on shunning unconstructive consequences and&nbsp.frequently&nbsp.results in anxiety. Thus, the failure to&nbsp.achieve&nbsp.in accordance with the&nbsp.ideal&nbsp.self and the ought&nbsp.self&nbsp.generate unconstructive emotions and reduces&nbsp.self-esteem. The self-evaluation theory explains Jeanette behaviour when she tries to explain that the packaging error was not her fault. Packaging was an area of high relevance to Jeanette, and it affected her that she had failed&nbsp.to effectively&nbsp.achieve&nbsp.her objectives. It is a blow to her&nbsp.self-esteem&nbsp.since she considers she would have done a better job had she not delegated the&nbsp.task. In addition, the self-discrepancy theory may also account for&nbsp.anxiety&nbsp.that Jeanette may have harboured due to the consequences of delegating the&nbsp.packaging&nbsp.task&nbsp.to Ken. An&nbsp.error&nbsp.