Answered>Order 12449

Hello, I am looking for someone to write an essay on Supreme Court of the United States. It needs to be at least 250 words.

?s case is consistent with ‘narrowly tailored’ use to achieve diversity and other factor to qualification are equally significant to the applicants’ selection process. Consequently, the use of race is not an isolated factor to selection and this undermines discrimination of applicants from minority races. The case of Grantz, however, fails to identify the ‘narrowly tailored’ application and instead offers advantage to applicants from minority races. This is because the university offers additional 20 percent points to applicants from minority races, a factor that makes race an isolated and significant factor to qualification. The ‘narrowly tailored’ concept therefore establishes constitutionality of the university’s provisions under the Grutter case but unconstitutionality under the Grantz case (Supreme Court of the United States 4. Supreme Court of the United States1 31).

Lee Bolinger was sued in both cases because he is an agent to the artificial person and therefore acts on behalf of the institution. He is therefore not sued on his personal capacity but on capacities of the positions that he held at the times that interests on the case arose. In the Grutter case, for example, he is sued in the capacity of the Dean of the Law School and the capacity of the University’s president while in the case of Grants, he is sued in his capacity as the University’s president.

Supreme Court of the United States. “Jennifer Grantz and Patrick Hamacher, petitioners v. Lee Bollinger et al., No. 02-516.” Supreme Court of the United States. N.d. Web. February 17, 2015. &lt. http://jay.law.ou.edu/faculty/Scaperlanda/Gratz.pdf&gt..

Supreme Court of the United States1. “Barbara Grutter, petitioner v. Lee Bbollinger et al.” Supreme Court of the United States. N.d. Web. February 17, 2015.