Entries by Student

write my assignment 8314

how to interpret p value form this printout please explain?’

what does the P value 1.9047E-79 mean?!!

Adjusted R Sq0.636432043Standard Emo37.5078021Observations1026ANOVASSdfMSFSignificance FRegression2529884.135 632471.034 449.570089 2.119E-223Residual10211436378.758 1406.83522Total10253966262.893CoefficientsStandard Errort StatP-valueLower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%Intercept26_108780814.796755069 5.44300896 6.5604E-08 16.6961555 35.5214061| 16.6961555 35.5214061Size57.651535133 2.791722484 20.6508833 1.9047E-79 52.1733655 63.1297047 52.1733655 63.1297047Baths16.731284252.911144474 5.74732185 1.1964E-08 11.0187741 22.4437944 11.0187741 22.4437944Fireplace10.492858132.754188227 3.80978251 0.0001474 5.08834164 15.8973746 5.08834164 15.8973746Age-0.2187390350.038384659 -5.6986056 1.5797E-08 -0.2940609 -0.1434172 -0.2940609 -0.1434172Rased on the Excel printout the following are the answers to the questions:XHeDELL

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 22584

Create a 4 page essay paper that discusses Acemoglu, Johnson and Robinson proved that institutions are the ultimate cause of economic development. Do you agree.

As a result, in societies where political and economic power has been distributed for a long time on a consistent basis, institutions are usually path-reliant. This occurs even in societies where the institutions are socioeconomically below the optimal standards of operation.

Acemoglu et al. (2001:1395) state that many scientists and economists hold that contrasts in institutions and government policies are the primary causes of huge disparities in income per capita among countries. They further claim that contrasts in colonial experience may be a genesis of exogenous disparities in institutions. This claim is based on two logics. The first is that Europeans employed very different strategies when colonizing other nations, and these strategies spawned different institutions. On one hand, such as in New Zealand, America, and Australia, they established institutions that implemented the rule of law and promoted investment. On the other hand, in countries like Ghana (Gold Coast) and the Congo, they established exploitative regimes aimed at quickly extracting resources. These institutions impeded economic growth and investment. Secondly, the institutions established in both extremes of the world remain in place today and have led to the differences in economic development and stability of the affected countries (Acemoglu, Johnson, & Robinson, 2001:1395).

According to Acemoglu et al. (2002:572), Atlantic trade catalysed European growth via ancillary institutional media as well as its more pertinent root effects. However, the crux of their argument, which relates to this paper, is that Atlantic trade earned huge profits for merchant interests in favour of institutional reform in states that satisfied two vital preconditions: democratic initial institutions and convenient access to the Atlantic. The result was a shift in political influence away from the

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 820

Assume you were the recipient of a large inheritance from a trust fund set up by your rich uncle. The trust documents provided you with a choice of how you wanted your benefits paid out. You could either choose to receive a one-time payment of $2 million or a series of 20 annual payments of $165,000 each which cannot be transferred to another person upon your death if you were to die before the 20 years expired. Which would you choose and why?

Don’t forget to consider things like the time value of money, your expected life span, fluctuating interest rates, investment risk and return, personal spending and saving patterns, etc.

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

write my assignment 14235

I need help please assignment due tomorrow before 2 am eastern time. i need someone who can use the Minitab Express to process the work.

phe5020_week_3_assigment_3.docx

Please, find comments attached. You must go over my comments regarding how to interpret the p-value. You are still making an incorrect interpretation.

Also, you submitted a chi-square test and interpretation on EXCEL for problem 1. Yet, for problem 1 you were asked to calculate the Odds Ratio (OR) to estimate the association between chili pepper consumption and gastric cancer. You did not conduct this analysis, but a different one. Please, go over my comments.

Remember, always include an introduction to the problem and a justification of why you are using the statistical method you are using. This is part of the assignment and included and considered on the rubric.

Here is how I graded your work:

Assignment 2 Grading CriteriaMaximum Points

Initial setup of the assignment—introduction.5/10

Explanation of the criteria for selecting the procedure in Minitab.15/30

Proper use of the Minitab statistical analysis tool and execution.10/15

Provided a copy of the output.10/15

Written interpretation of results using correct spelling, grammar, professional vocabulary, and APA format.20/30

Total:

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer