Hi, I am looking for someone to write an article on forms of goverment Paper must be at least 250 words. Please, no plagiarized work! Forms of Government Forms of Government Constitutional ethic in public service calls for officers in government offices to behave in manners that are in line with the constitution’s fundamental structures (Dickerson et al., 2009). In the process, these officials have to avoid behaving in demoralizing manners. For good or bad, public officials have substantial authority to behave accordingly. Constitutional ethic in public service is a benchmark for guiding the officials’ judgments and behaviors.

American exceptionalism is the unique trait of the United States as an exceptionally independent nation thriving on democratic principles, personal equality, and individual liberty (Dickerson et al., 2009). The United States occasionally infers this unique trait from the nature of political foundations characterized by the Declaration of Independence, the American Revolution, and the constitution.

Public purpose is any decision or policy enacted by the government in favor of the nation as a whole. Public purpose often requires the government to justify ethical and unethical means for establishing distinguished domain over domestic and sometimes international property. The public sector is the section of an economy that offers primary government amenities (Dickerson et al., 2009). The government controls and finances this section.

The rule of law is important in controlling how governments and other public organizations exercise their powers (Dickerson et al., 2009). Under this importance, the rule of law addresses the concept of supremacy and sovereignty of the constitution. The rule of law further ensures that the law applies to all people equally while providing even protection without bias.

The Pendleton Civil Service Reform Act is a policy that set up a value-based system of choosing government officials and overseeing their work (Benedict, 2011). President Chester Alan Arthur signed this act in January 16, 1883. President Arthur named this act after its main sponsor Senator George Pendleton, an Ohio democrat in 1882. Even so, renowned lawyer and campaigner for civil service improvements, Dorman Bridgman Eaton, wrote it. According to Eaton, this act would award work based on value analyses and a civil service committee would oversee the entire procedure (Benedict, 2011).

References

Benedict, C. M. (2011). Pendleton Civil Service Reform ACT. New York, NY: Phon.

Dickerson, M. O., Flanagan, T., Dickerson, M. O., ONeill, B., Flanagan, T., and ONeill, B. (2009). An Introduction to Government and Politics: A Conceptual Approach. New York, NY: Cengage Learning.

Compose a 750 words essay on The Debate on Capital Punishment in Canada. Needs to be plagiarism free!

e history of capital punishment in Canada dates back to 1749 when Peter Cartcel was hanged to death after he was convicted of the murder of one person and injuring two other people (Matthiassen, Möller and Forsman, 2003.). That act became the beginning of capital punishment in Canada and has remained in the law books of the country since then. But looking at the fact that the life of a person is the most expensive treasure that any one can possess, I oppose the capital punishment, which prescribes that those who take life must have their lives taken.

From a legal perspective, am against capital punishment in Canada because people can be accused wrongly of the murder of other people and once death penalty is prescribed for such people, it will not be possible to restore their lives after they are latter found to be innocent. There remain several accounts in the legal system of Canada whereby people who have been convicted of murder cases have appealed their cases and own (SacKinnon, 1999). This means that any hasty decisions and actions that were taken to prescribe the capital punishment for these people would have deprived these people forever and there would have been no means of reversing their judgment. Meanwhile, the laws of the land demand that all people who are accused of cases have the right to appeal in higher courts of hearing (Mathiassen and Ahsberg, 2009,). Essentially, any person who is given the capital punishment and eventually executed will be denied that precious right to appeal. What is more, the laws are very silent on the number of years within which a person may appeal his or her judgment. Therefore, if people who are accused of murder are speared their lives, they will be in a better position to benefit from the law of appeal in many years to come so that they can have criminal charges leveled against them reversed.

On humanitarian grounds, there can virtually be no argument that supports the killing of human life as the human life is very