From an analysis of external and internal conditions, determine a firm’s market position and business level and supporting strategies.

The content of chapters 3 and 4 are some of the most important in strategic management as they relate the concepts of value creation, firm performance and competitive advantage.  Knowing this, a firm can define its business unit level strategy (addressed in chapter 5).

So, using the language of this discipline, explain the way in which your firm creates value.   If your firm has multiple business units, select one of them to use for illustration (rather than trying to do them all).  You may also use Davenport University or a non-profit organization you have knowledge about using the following questions as a guide:

• How does the organization evaluate its performance in financial terms? 
• How does it acquire, retain and enhance its “Human Capital”?

Being able to express these important concepts in the context of your firm/organization is an important executive skill.  I look forward to reading your postings and collegial feedback.

I will pay for the following essay UK LAW problem question. The essay is to be 2 pages with three to five sources, with in-text citations and a reference page.

where a charging authority serve notice under regulation 13(6) that they do not accept that a ground on which representations were made under that regulation has been established, the person making those representations may appeal to an adjudicator against the charging authoritys decision before&nbsp.-&nbsp.

Held: that regulation 16(2) permitted an adjudicator to direct the cancellation of a penalty charge notice where the recipient had failed to establish one of the grounds specified in regulation 13(3)(a) to (f) but there were other reasons for mitigating the penalty or totally relieving the recipient of the penalty.

1. Under the Road User Charging (Enforcement and Adjudication) (London) Regulations 2001,while applying the relevant grounds under reg. 13 Mr. Vere may be able to plead that due to his extenuating circumstances (daughter’s ill health etc) no penalty charge should be payable by him (reg.13(c)) or that the amount that he has been charged exceeds the amount applicable in the circumstances of the case( reg. 13 (e).However it seems that he has a better chance of making this a case of mitigating circumstances under reg.13(c). Nevertheless as the facts of the case indicate he has infact done this without any success and the TFL has already rejected his representations as to his mitigating circumstances.

2. In such a case Regulation 16 will preside and allow his appeal to be heard by an adjudicator. This provision provides a flexible way out from the stringent TFL Regulations and case law suggests that the office of the adjudicator has used his authority in the past to direct the cancellation of a penalty charge notice even where the appellant failed to establish any of the grounds under 13(3).The position for Mr. Vere is not quite clear here though as he has been refused the mandate to represent his daughter’s ill health as a ground