Public Good. This good being distributed is a pure public good. Once produced it can be offered to anyone without a reduction in quantity. A firm offers free videos to customers. It costs the firm $5 per video to supply.  

Public Good . This good being distributed is a pure public good . Once produced it can be offered toanyone without a reduction in quantity . A firm offers free videos to customers . It costs the firm 55 pervideo to supply .# of videos per weekI1FE.Customer # 1FCustomer # 2222111Customer # 3)322Value of GoodTotal Value ( V X Q]Marginal Value*Production Decision , MV = MC : Q* =_ Total Value* =Total Cost of Production =Total Taxes from each resident = TV /3 =Resident Total Valuation = # 1 =` # 2 =Vote on Output level ( Y’ or N ) # 1 =`# 2 =` # 3 =Impact on Budget = Total Taxes – Total Cost =

Complete 7 page APA formatted essay: Case 5.1 MERCK ACQUISITION OF MEDCO.

avings, whereby a company paying higher taxes because of high income can acquire another firm with accumulated losses, which after the acquisition will reduce the overall taxable income and tax liability. The other advantage of acquisition is that it allows the company to achieve short term growth. The target would benefit from the predator since, in most cases, predators are well-established companies. thus fasten the growth of the target (Finkelstein, 2010). Asset backing is another merit behind the acquisition. For instance, Merck would benefit from the well-established database set up by Medco and would allow Merck to achieve its objectives by using these valuable resources, which would be acquired from the target company Medco. Therefore, the decision to buy Medco Containment Services by Merck, and Company should be driven by the above factors.

One of the major forces driving the acquisition of Medco Containment Services by Merck and Company is the growth in the managed health care, which has been contracted by the managed health care organization to Medco Containment Services. Managed health care is a new phenomenon in the health care industry and the health expert (Kolassa & Greg, 2012) predicts that by the end of the current century, at least 90% of the Americans will have the cost of their drugs included in some managed health care plan. Besides, at least 60% of all the outpatient medicine will be able to be purchased by the managed health care programs (Merck and Company Inc., 2002). Therefore, the planned acquisition of Medco Containment Services by Merck and Company would be timely since it would allow the predator to benefit from these lucrative business deals being enjoyed by the Medco Containment Services. As such, a substantial beneficial synergy would be created since Merck and Company is the manufacturer of drugs and Medco Containment Services manages the insurance claims, hence will encourage patients to utilize cheap generic substitute drugs