Write 7 page essay on the topic Critical analysis of the Urbanisation (cause-effect fram work).

This is reflected in the increased importance given to health and environment concerns in the formulation of national plans for sustainable development, by many countries. It is essential that these plans are supported and implemented by all sectors contributing to economic development. It is essential that long-term intervention is directed at reducing the driving forces that generate the environmental health threats. Successful public health interventions concentrate on improving human environments and promote a more holistic perspective on health (Corvalan et al, 1999: 656). New tools are needed to ensure that intersectoral action is implemented in the way that the health sector functions. Improving coordination might be one of the most important ways in which we can help put the planet back on a healthy and sustainable path, states Schimding (2002: 632).

forces that generate environmental pressures, creating changes in the state of the environment and eventually contributing to human exposures, states the World Health Organisation Report (1997: 2). Kahlmeier & Braun-Fahrlander (2004: 104) support the use of the frame-work.

mediated health hazard may be the immediate cause of ill health, the “driving force” and “pressures”leading to environmental degradation may be the most effective points of control of the hazard. The “network” of connections within the framework can be used to identify

cause-effect “pathways” or “trees,” depending on whether the framework is used to analyze the multiple health effects of a single driving force (eg, transport policy relying on car transport leading to increased motor vehicle related injuries, effects on the respiratory system, noise

disturbance, etc) or to analyze the multiple causes of a single health effect, for example: acute respiratory infections in children resulting from driving forces such as poverty, household energy policies, housing policies, and agricultural policies

I need some assistance with these assignment. maritime finance final Thank you in advance for the help! Therefore it can be concluded that scheme 1 is better than scheme 2 and it must be accepted

Here while comparing the two schemes on the basis of the payback period. The payback period of scheme 1 is 3.4 years and the payback period of scheme 2 is 3.3 years. Hence it can be concluded that scheme 2 is to be accepted. As the scheme with a lower payback period is acceptable.

Comparing on the basis of the profitability index it has been observed that scheme 2 with a profitability index of 2.13 is better than that of scheme 1 with a profitability index of 1.92. The profitability index which is also known as the benefit-cost ratio indicates that the profitability index of more than 1 is to be accepted. Here the profitability index of both the project is more than 1. But comparing the two schemes it is found that the profitability index of scheme 2 is more than that of scheme 1. Hence Scheme 2 is to be accepted.

From the calculation of the above techniques of capital budgeting it is observed and concluded that scheme 1 with more Net present value, internal rate of return, and Scheme 1 with more Profitability index and payback period as compared to that of scheme 1. Hence we can conclude that Scheme 1 is to be accepted as it is for fewer years that the cash flow will generate in 5 years, whereas the cash flow for scheme 2 will generate in 6 years (Abbas, 2012).

Private equity is an important alternative source of funding for industries because it provides equity securities and debt for operating in those companies which are not publicly traded. Private equity is generally and usually referred to as the private capital as private equity provides a company with a very long term investment strategy. Mezzanine capital, venture capital is all included in the private equity is an important alternative source for funding of the logistics industry (Morgan, Lewis and Bockius LLP, 2014). Private equity as well as the hedge funds are now buying the risky.&nbsp.