Entries by Student

write my assignment 15031

Main Task Part 2: Compare and Contrast HR Generalists and HR Specialists Conduct preliminary research, locate a minimum of two (2) articles to help identify the differences between the two types of HR functions identified: generalist and specialist. In a paper, indicate whether one type of HR specialty is viewed as superior. Do the authors of the articles you located take a position and seem to support one function over the other? Defend your argument with examples of how specialists and generalists work within an organization.Support your paper with a minimum of two (2) resources, which may include your required text. In addition to these specified resources, other appropriate scholarly resources, including older articles, may be included.Length: 3-5 pages not including title and reference pagesYour paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course and provide new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy.Submit your document for Part 2 in the Course Work area below the Activity screen.Learning Outcomes: 1, 2 Assignment OutcomesDescribe the contribution of human resources to organizational outcomes.Critique human resources as they relate to both objective and subjective elements of managing human capital.

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

April 26, 2022by

write my assignment 23423

Need an argumentative essay on Manegenment. Needs to be 2 pages. Please no plagiarism.

As the manager she was supposed to handle all managerial functions including inventory. She compounded the problem by paying her assistant more money than any of the other employees at the store. Ruth did not have the foresight to realize that the move could cause morale problems among the staff of the store.

Ken Hoffman seemed very disappointed at a lot of decisions that Ruth was making. His perception was that Ruth’s poor performance as a manager was reflecting badly on him because he was the person that appointed her for the job. Ken made some mistakes along the way and he violated various empowerment guidelines. One of the empowerment guidelines that Ken violated was self-determination or choice. Ruth arranged on her own a TV slot where she could showcase the store and its products. Her initiative seemed like a great move for the store. Ken reprimanded Ruth and told her that she made a bad decision by taking that initiative since she was supposed to clear with the corporate office any TV appearances. The second empowerment guideline that was violated by Ken was trust. When Ruth followed company policy and disallowed a customer to make a purchase above $1,000 Ken insulted Ruth which made no sense since she was following company policy as indicated by Ken in earlier incidents.

The decision about determining the best portfolio and investment recommendations for the company should not be made by me alone due to the fact that my knowledge and skills are limited to bonds. There is a team in place that can help me determine the best course of action in the selection process of equity investments. The knowledge this group possesses is imperative towards the success of the project. The reason that this decision is harder than it seems is because in the past these four employees have had problems working together and agreeing on decisions. As the person responsible for the report it is my duty to provide the leadership necessary to make this work. One of the

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

April 26, 2022by

write my assignment 12257

Tom and Betty Smart have lived on the same 100 acre farm in rural Pennsylvania for 60  years. In fact, the farm has been in the family for over 125 years. An oil and gas company recently surveyed over 1000 acres in this rural area of Pennsylvania and determined that the area was ideal for “fracking”. Fracking is a process where a company drills into the ground at high pressure in an effort to obtain some type of oil from the shale rocks buried below the surface. Pennsylvania as a state was in economic downturn so its legislature passed a state law providing oil and gas companies the legal right to force landowners to sell their land so that the oil and gas company could “frack”. The Smarts do not want to sell their property to anyone for any price.

1) Discuss the Smart’s legal position should they want to fight the state from “forcing them” to sell their land. Include in your discussion what legal cause of action ( if any) the Smarts have against Pennsylvania. What legal right does Pennsylvania have to force the Smarts to sell their land

2) Include the relevant law that is applicable

3) Discuss the legal relief (if any) the Smarts will be able to request.

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

April 26, 2022by

write my assignment 4740

In November 2012, voters in Colorado and Washington voted to legalize marijuana for recreational use in contradiction of Federal law (Controlled Substances Act) that prohibits such possession and use. The Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution states that when there is a conflict between state and federal laws, the federal law is the supreme law of the land. In other words, individuals who possess marijuana in those states are violating federal law and can be subject to the federal sanctions set forth in the Act.How should the federal government deal with legalization of marijuana for recreational use in those states? Should the Federal Government enforce the laws or ignore the violations and allow those states to disregard and violate clearly stated federal law?

 

"Not answered?"


Get the Answer

April 26, 2022by