Harrison Company makes two products and uses a conventional costing system in which a single plant-wide predetermined overhead rate is computed based on direct labor-hours. Data for the two products for the upcoming year follow: Rascon Parcel ——————————————————————————– These products are customized to some degree for specific customers. Requirement 1: The company’s manufacturing overhead costs for the year are expected to be $576,000. Using the-company’s conventional costing system, compute the unit product costs for the two products. (Do not round intermediate calculation. Round your final answers to 2 decimal places. Omit the “$” sign in your response.)Parcel $ Requirement 2: Management is considering an activity-based costing system in which half of the overhead would continue to be allocated on the basis of direct labor-hours and half would be allocated on the basis of engineering design time. This time is expected to be distributed as follows during the upcoming year: Rascon Parcel Total Engineering design time (in hours) 3,000 3,000 6,000 ——————————————————————————– Compute the unit product costs for the two products using the proposed ABC system. (Do not round intermediate calculation. Round your final answers to 2 decimal places. Omit the “$” sign in your response.)Parcel $

Provide your answers to the following questions with a 2-3 page Essay MLA format.Make sure to answer all the questions in detail and well written.  The Essay consists of two parts 

Part I-                    Discuss how each of the following topics listed below might be in comprehensive code of ethics and conduct.

a.      The workplace

b.      Gift, favors, and conflicts of interest

c.       Use of company assets and data safeguarding

d.      Product quality, safety, and environment matters

e.      Competition and antitrust law

f.        International Business Practice

Part II-                  Based on your understanding of ethical issues at the workplace answer the questions of this small case.

CASE

In 2011, high-tech workers in Silicon Valley filed a class action antitrust suit against employers Apple Inc., Google Inc., Intel Corp., and Adobe Systems Inc. The complaint alleged that these high-tech companies agreed to not poach each other’s workers, thus limiting employee’s job mobility and artificially limiting their salaries. Noncompete contracts are unenforceable in California, so these human resources collusion strategy was sued as an alternative to prevent high-tech workers from departing to compete at other large companies. The trial court denies the companies motion to dismiss the case, shortly before trial, a settlement was reached between the parties for $415 million.

Case questions

1.      Was it ethical for these high-tech companies to agree not to hire each other’s employees? Explain

2.      Is it ethical to use legal means such as noncompete contracts to prevent workers from leaving to join another business? How is this case different?

3.      Which CSR view did the tech companies adopt in this case?

4.      Which CSR view would you apply to this issue, and how would it be resolved under your view?