I need an essay that needs to be 3 pages long, typed in the correct MLA format. Since this essay deals with an outside source(the Sherry article), plan on two pages of text with page 3 being the Work Cited page.

Here is the prompt for Essay#3

In the artice, “In Praise of the ‘F’ Word”, Mary Sherry argues that she used to blame students’ poor academic skills on “drugs, divorce, and other impediments”(502).

To what extent should teachers take these and similair issues to account when grading students? Are there certain situations that call for leniency, or should out-of-school forces affecting students not be considered? Write an essay in which you argue your position. Provide specific examples from Sherry’s article to support your argument. When possible, acknowledge and refute opposing viewpoints.

As you are structuring the essay, remember to follow a standard form for a summary-response-type argumet paper.

I. Introductory Paragraph-Introduce issue and summarize outside source(the Sherry article)

II. Body Paragraphs:

A. Point 1- summary point/response evidence

B. Point 2- summary point/response evidence

C. Point 3- summary point/response evidence, et cetera

III. Conclusion-wrap up argument

IV. Work Cited Page

Please include a plagarism report with this essay and it needs to be done by April 17th @ 12pm (CST)… I am not able to attach this article to my question because for some odd reason it’s not letting me hopefully you will be able to find this article.

Need an argumentative essay on Rembrandt-the anatomy lesson of Dr . tulip. Needs to be 3 pages. Please no plagiarism.

Their distinctive white collars are a symbol of prestige and wealth in the seventeenth century when the mercantile class saw an incline in the Dutch society. Dr. Tulip seems like he is ready to explain some clinical phenomena and all the men around him are eager to hear and view the miracle of medical science. Simultaneously, the body of the dead is also shown in light, but his face has blurring effects so to depict lack of life. Yet, life is evident on the faces of these doctors who are surrounding it, but their own bodies are well hidden underneath the cloaks, which demonstrate their moral and realistic presence in the operation room.

These men have almost similar type of facial hair, curvy moustache and triangular beard in flaming red colour so to depict the social status equality of elite and literate class in the Dutch society. At the far end there is an open book probably of medicine shedding light on theories of anatomy. However, the book is painted under dark shades to show the negligence of society towards investigation and new research. Few surgeons seem to be gazing at the opened pages of the book so to relate the practical dissection with the relevant theory and that makes the portrait more superlative in its realistic manner.

Dr. Tulip is painted from a central view with the theme of clinical operation. The other doctors are placed in a geometrical manner where three men are leaning in for a closer look. They are in the shape of a triangle, the other two men on the opposite side of Dr. Tulip make a curve and the two distant men at the back form a simple straight line (34-35, Pescio). The purpose was to show the room full of learners of science, which was not the actual practice in the seventeenth century. Top of Form

The painting offers an insight on how with the course of time science will take over the medieval notions of incurability, medical advancements and human survival. The group of men